- DUE PERFIDE GUERRE SOVRAPPOSTE. CON SORPRESE A DICEMBRE?L’EDITORIALE DEL VENERDI di Arai Daniele La «sorpresina» d’ottobre si era resa inutile in vista dei sondaggi che praticamente davano Killary eletta. Se è vero che qualcosa di grosso sarebbe tentato per impedire quel che è avvenuto, che sarà ora dopo il voto a Donald Trump? Perché, più che sorpresa, è un vero shock per […]
Fátima e a Paixão da Igreja
ON THE VALIDITY OF THE SECRET PUBLISHED IN 2000
novembro 1, 2012Publicado por em
After all comments and interpretations of today´s Vatican related to the third part of the Secret of Fatima, it appears that there is a consensus that these are in fact a contradictory and deceptive cover-up.
)How come that in this disgraceful interpretation of the Secret given by our Most Holy Mother no one finds any relevant statement? (See also http://wp.me/pWrdv-FU)
This is obvious and has been analyzed to the point of reaching another, and far more serious conclusion, that, there are in the Vatican, since the time of John 23 a score traitors and liars who obfuscate the meaning of the Secret of Our Lady. Therefore it must be inquired whether this also concerns in any way the Doctrine – the Dogma of Faith.
The answer is that there is a clear resemblance between this interpretation and the behavior of the «conciliar popes», not only from the point of view of the doctrinal content, but of the time when the Secret was supposed to be revealed because then «it will be clearer». This time turned out to be the beginning of the «aggiornamento». Now, in the light of today´s happenings, it is even clearer.
Therefore there is an even more serious final conclusion that appears to be forgotten, because it is undeniable that this part of the Secret already describes much of the present reality, and comes as a continuation of the former warning of La Salette: «Rome will lose the faith and will become the seat of the Antichrist».
At Fatima, Our Lady gives to the faithful a prophecy that is related to our horrible times in the Church when the new deviant prelates are benefitting of the destruction of the Faith, after the attack against the Vicar of Truth, which the Secret predicts. How do we know that they are benefitting of this? Because the advance of the apostasy, in an obviously headless Church, heterodox and scandalous as it can be, these obvious facts are being disputed.
In fact John 23 started a trend by censuring a sign that he recognized as being of a Divine origin, which his successors continued to recognize as such even to the time of John Paul 2º, who approached this sign in order to foment the cult of his personality, and covering up his intention with other falsehoods and lies.
We have already shed a light on this fact in several articles and books, and we will resume them in short within this article.
John Paul 2º has read the Secret shortly after his election, as he said laying in his hospital bed to a journalist, but later he stated that he had read it only after the assassination attempt of the St. Peter’s Square.
In the meantime, in Fulda he has alluded to an «apocryphal secret» that turned away the attention of the Catholic from the real disaster. By doing this, he deceived Sister Lucy too, by referring to his conversation with Gorbachev to obtain her consent to his sell-out to Communism.
As for Ratzinger, he thinks as Fr. Dhanis does, who denies the veracity of the Secret, but as this does not suit his popularity, he goes on stating things that journalists can found interesting.
From all of this two hypotheses are stemming that are related to the accountability of the same Vatican of today:
1st – The text of the vision of the Secret about the virtual massacre of the Pope and his followers, was falsified or mutilated by some imposters in the Vatican that have replaced not only the text, but also Sister Lucy, who confirmed the same.
2nd – The text published in 2000 is indeed authentic, and the Catholic Pope, guardian of the revealed truth, has been virtually eliminated.
Both hypotheses point the finger to the Vatican: either there are imposters in that place, or the watchman that impedes religious falsehoods, i.e.the pope, has been eliminated.
This is the only way that the Holy See could publish false letters as if they were the visions revealed by Mary Most Holy.
Either way, we have a proof of a forgery; whether the text is faked, as some wish to believe, or it is authentic, as we would like it to be, either way the conclusion is unavoidable! This is really amazing! So amazing that many prefer to suspect the text published in 2000 with the approval of Sister Lucy being fake rather than accusing the crowned of the forgery.
What helps one in recognizing the authenticity of the text?
As it has been shown this cannot be done with the aid of the potentates in today´s Vatican. However, one can do this indirectly observing their shameful behavior in front of the Secret of Our Lady, which due to its source cannot be presumed to be a fake. Could they devise a score of techniques to falsify the writing and another to substitute Sister Lucy?
Had they done this, they would have contrived a text more suitable to their plots. Truly, the text has been revealed because Providence also makes use of the abstruse pride of the potentates in order to furnish the truth to all.
These principles must be applied humbly in order to decipher what seems to be mysterious, answering some key questions of the third part of the Secret, which we call the Third Secret.
1st – Are there in this part any words of Our Lady? We answer this in the affirmative.
2nd – Are these words following the phrase that “in Portugal the Dogma of Faith will be always preserved, etc.”?
The reply is positive, because this is logically deductible and has been confirmed by Sister Lucy.
3rd -Does anything related to the third part agree with the first and second parts?
The answer is positive, because there was in them a conclusive trace that belongs necessarily to the third part.
4th – But if this part was meant to be a secret, why was it published together with the other parts by Sister Lucy?
The answer is that because Jesus has communicated to her on December 17th of 1927 that she must publish everything referring to the devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary and in this last part this is clearly present.
5th – If after the vision of Hell Our Lady spoke to console the frightened little shepherds, why did She not do the same after the vision of the «papal massacre»?
The answer is that She truly has pronounced words of final consolation; they are the ones known for a long time.
6th – In the light of these answers, how can we perceive the third part of the Secret? The answer is that by considering the place of the phrase about Portugal, which is the key to the question.
The Key Hypothesis Resolving the Authenticity of the Published Secret
There is no doubt about the constant struggle of Sister Lucy to obey the Divine command of not revealing the third part of the Secret. This is known since the time of her conversations with Jacinta, which are already revealing because they refer to the «sufferings of the Holy Father».
However, as Sister has rendered it, the content of the secret part is unknown. Msgr. Bertone could have asked about it, being sent by John Paul. But this man did not think about the question, unfamiliar as he was with the topic.
However, those acquainted with the issue due to the writings and actions of Sister Lucy, are able to understand what happened, finding some hints in the vast literature on Fatima.
The Seer was not certain whether the phrase referring to Portugal belonged to the third part of the Secret. That is why she did not publish this in her Third Memoir, but convinced herself that she can publish it in her Fourth Memoir, as she did. But where can she place this phrase, before or after the vision of the secret?
For a better description of the topic, it would fit better at the end. And the phrase has been left there without anybody asking why, even if they found it to be strange that there is a phrase out of context at the end of the Message.
The “why” is answered by the actions of Sister Lucy concealing the secret. Where would be better to place the phrase in order to explain the whole Secret in its integrity, starting from the phrase… «several nations will be annihilated»?
Returning to the answers we previously had – and even those that doubt the authenticity of the published Secret think this way – that in the same manner as after the vision of Hell Our Lady spoke words of consolation to the frightened little shepherds, she must have done the same after the vision of the «papal massacre», using words of consolation to the Portuguese little shepherds, who have just heard about «annihilated nations» as Portugal was at war. In any case, a nation held together by its faith cannot be obliterated.
Therefore, one is dealing with the final words of the Message which are known for a long time and which concluding the Secret, belong to its third and last part. They were made public by Lucy, therefore they belong to the «Third Secret» because they refer to the devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary and due to this they must be made known, as Jesus has advised on December 17th 1927.
This way we see how the Secret is built up in its final part, after the phrase «several nations will be annihilated» and after the vision of the papal massacre, which can lead one to think about the final elimination of the Catholic pope.
“In Portugal the Dogma of Faith will be always preserved, (etc., this is all we previously knew about the secret from the diary of Sr. Lucy)… “In the end My Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to Me, and she will convert, and a time of peace will be given to the world.”
The Secret of Fatima therefore represents the vision of a papal hecatomb, as seen by the children, but the prophecy concludes with the presence of the Catholic Pope, and therefore, with the triumph of the Faith and of the Virgin Mary.
She promised to come back to Fatima “again, for the seventh time”, probably at a time related to the return of the Catholic Pope, who will finally satisfy the request of consecration, which will make the triumph of the Faith manifest by obtaining the conversion of Russia and a period of peace to the world.
Hence the final triumph of Mary Most Holy is anticipating a real resurrection of Christianity after the lethal laceration which is, for the Church and the world, the vacancy of the Papal See.
Nobody can deny this fact, especially after reading the third part of the Secret about the liquidation of the Catholic Pope with all his faithful followers, consecrated ones and laypeople, men and women, «with gunshots and arrows».
The vision is a symbolic one, but it pertains to the currently living to verify what happened to the Church shortly before 1960.
Due to the eschatological dimension of this statement, only the election of an intruder, a deceitful modernist and freemason sympathizer can accomplish this, which ruined life of the world and of the Church, by removing the «obstacle» to the apocalyptic licentiousness of conscience and religion.
We do not know how much this state of affairs will last, but against facts there are no arguments, with or without the vision of the Secret. The bare minimum that can be stated without the fear of erring, is that there is no longer a Guardian of Truth presiding in the Vatican.
Call its actual head as you wish, except Catholic Pope, because this would be a false witness against the Faith, pure and entire, which this statement would corrupt.
To comprehend accordingly the timing given by the Secret of Fatima one has to follow not only the explicit testimony of Lucy, but also the implicit one. Her explicit testimony includes the words and visions transmitted by the Seer, while the indirect one consists of her reactions to the representatives of the Church.
In fact, given that the Secret refers to an escalating anti-Christian revolution within the very bosom of the Church, which will result in liquidating the Pope, this testimony must warn us against this danger, despite the plots and diabolical cunning of the ones perceived as clergy, which are the enemies of the Church and infiltrated her in high places.
The certain fact is that he who accepts the falsehood of a modernist pope reigning over the Church in Her Seat of Truth also accepts the supreme lie, of which all the others flow abundantly.
Even without knowing the vision of the Secret, to deny the obvious liquidation of the divine and Catholic authority of the papacy, which has been demolished by the «conciliar popes» promoting Vatican 2º and the new religious order, means to deny the current reality which is lasting for more than a half of a century.
What can one expect after this vision of «liquidation» of the Pope with all of his Catholic followers? Do we need words of explanation in order to assume the position dictated by the Law of the Church in the presence of this occupation government?
This must be testified to even without knowing the Secret. But besmirching the validity of the Secret in order to avoid the accusation of the wreckers of the Church is an unworthy act of her faithful children.
What the Divine plans would be to rectify this situation of complete destruction is not for us to know. Albeit this is certain, we cannot accept that some liars should preside in the Vatican disguised as Catholic Pontificate.
Archbishop Lefebvre alluded to this in his letter to the cardinals to prevent them from electing someone to continue Vatican II, which turned out to be John Paul 2º. Later, together with Bp. Castro-Mayer, he clearly stated that the prelates that accept the conciliar doctrine are no longer Catholics. How could then they elect a true Pope?
If even until today an invincible ignorance of the institution of papacy forced many people to accept the election of the destroyers of the Faith, in the next conclave such a consensus will be fatal also for the traditionalists who will become accomplices of the perpetration of such a disgrace in the name of the Church.
Let us prepare doing our best to avoid this disgrace by starting to put up a real resistance animated by the cults of The Sacred Heart of Our Lord and of the Immaculate Heart of His Mother and based on the Law of His Church: that of the absolute incompatibility between he conciliar heresy and jurisdiction within the Church of Jesus Christ.
If we refuse to do this, the stones will cry out and yell.
Quod Deus avertet!