Pro Roma Mariana

Fátima e a Paixão da Igreja

IN THE PROPHECY OF FATIMA … THE MYSTERIES OF A DREADFUL CENTENARY

Pio XII contestado

Arai Daniele

“He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same beareth much fruit: for without me you can do nothing. 6 If any one abide not in me, he shall be cast forth as a branch, and shall wither, and they shall gather him up, and cast him into the fire, and he burneth. 7 If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, you shall ask whatever you will, and it shall be done unto you. 8 In this is my Father glorified; that you bring forth very much fruit, and become my disciples.” (Jo 15, 5-8, Douay-Rheims translation.)

Our Lady when she says and repeats: “If you do what I ask of you …. Otherwise …”
We know that this Prophecy was a response to the universal supplication of the Church in the desperate times of war, and was subsequently confirmed by the miracle of the Sun, «so that all may believe». The prophecy has already contained everything important showing that it offers an extremely important and miraculous aid to the Church and to the world.
Perhaps there might have been some difficulties on the natural level to figure out everything our Heavenly Mother wanted to transmit through the children. But this was possible and a prudent thing to do. Since the necessary graces were lacking, and Providence even permitted compliance to be impeded.
Years have passed until these words could have yielded any results. Even today it is veiled by silence and confusion. It was the beginning of a tragic century for the Church and the world.
It is then always timely to return to the historic lesson furnished by the Prophecy, which very few care to understand, let alone relate to the words of Jesus, like any prophecy did not come from the Lord of time and history.
On this centenary of Fatima and at this dark moment of history can one persist to refuse to understand this, and hence to continue to have some catastrophic consequences on the horizon? Let us, therefore recapitulate the events starting from 1917, which still indelibly mark our days.
-The arrival of the Americans to Europe to defeat the German and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Europe was being Americanized, even in the realm of religion, where the Americanist ecumenism unfortunately dominates.
-The Bolshevik revolution in Russia, which spread its errors throughout the world; these are some falsehoods against Christianity that even after the fall of the Soviet Empire are being spread by other malign entities.
-The green signal of the English Crown to Zionism, i.e. the Balfour declaration which did not disguise the intention to precipitate the end time prophecies related to the ending of the time of the nations.
-The shameful peace treaty that has inevitably caused the Second World War. Therefore, in order to deal with the beasts of the French Republic, the hyenas of the City and the jackals of Wall Street, the Germans have unleashed Hitler, greedy enough to devour the world.
-The foreseen and prophesied war which was worse, resulted in more victims and ended with the perfidious treaty of Yalta to divide the world, which in turn unexpectedly gave more power to the brutal Stalin.
-The deterioration of the Papacy, which did not follow the great feat of Pope St. Pius X, nor did it paid due attention to the Fatima Prophecy, and gave some contradictory solutions to the human issues at hand, that ended in the debacle that followed Pope Pius XII.

It was then fulfilled what St. Gregory the Great has predicted:
“The Church in the last days will be deprived of her powers. The prophetic spirit will hide from her, she will lose the necessary graces to discharge her public office, the grace of abstinence will be diminished, her teaching powers will vanish, even if not completely, and so will the power of miracles and prodigies. An army of apostate priests will be prepared to the Antichrist. In the end times there will be a perfect unity of the evil, while between the just there will be division and discord.” (Book XXXV on Job c.1. Epistles 1 v, 1, XVIII). But let us see:
Pope Benedict XV, who invoked the aid of the Mediatrix and then did not acknowledge It, has finished his reign without saying a single word about Fatima and Communism, the two events that highlighted his pontificate.
Pius XI took up the challenge of so many Concordats, trying even to come to terms with the Soviet Union, but the Fatima demands were all but forgotten while his encyclical condemning communism as intrinsically perverted, waited fifteen long years in the making.
Pius XII, the Pope of Fatima, has tried to comply with the request, but only halfway, and allowed the words of the Blessed Mother to be perverted for political purposes. It was he who has promoted the future wreckers of the Church.
Because punishment must be meted out wherever the delict has been committed, and since these three popes were the ones leaving the door open to a “modernist papacy”, assenting to the construction of a new order to substitute the Christian Order, masonic and Zionist, altering the words of Our Lord and rendering them powerless as are many other ideologies, the Papacy has collapsed after Pius XII.
Hence, politicians and the clergy, who have reduced Christianity to a naught, did not give any indications of awareness that today´s disaster will end in a total collapse, a dead end. In fact, Order and Common Good has always depended on the Christian spirit, the very same they so nefariously have attacked or abandoned.
The Key Question: the Perfidy of a False Papacy
It is obvious that the root of all problems is the lack of a Catholic Papacy on which all Christianity hinges. The awareness of the central importance of this truth, commonly unknown, if not denied by a clerical world living happily in its fatal heedlessness, is also lacking. They devise crooked theories about the impossibility of any human solution, cunningly coining the lofty term of “conclavism” as if the main problem were not the false popes elected by conclaves that must be declared null and void, but those attesting to this nefarious vacancy and demand a true Pope.
As long as the return of a true pope is desired, without inventing a church not needing a Vicar of Christ for clarifying the issues of Faith and morals, the legitimate aspiration for all Catholics, and even a chief duty for the clergy is to do everything in their power to convene a «conclave» to elect a legitimate pope. Hence, the Catholic who prays for this, wills it. Of course, one should be aware of a «wild conclavism», a ridiculous act of a group purporting to create a universal religious authority out of thin air. However, one must recall that the most pernicious «conclavism» repudiates a fundamental assumption of a true conclave, namely that it can only elect a tried and true Catholic to receive his powers directly from God and not from the conclave to which should not be imputed an absolute authority as some did in the case of John 23.
Therefore, the impasse at hand remains to be the following: when and where will be possible to elect a pope by an atomized Church? This is not really as difficulty as it seems, once the invalidity of the conclaves electing modernists and masons becomes widely recognized. Until then everything remains thwarted due to an erroneous vision of the true apostolic succession.
The consequence is that today the religious life, without the legitimacy of the Sacraments, the ordinary jurisdiction of bishops and priests, who should be under Christ through His Vicar, is muddled up in the absence thereof. Theories that call this ridiculous «wild conclavism» an absolute evil add more to the confusion. This leaves many frozenly inert and even worse, leads them into an «absolute conclavism» which through absurd propositions purports to impose the legitimacy of some «materialiter» antichrists; whose authority, for being elected by an apparently canonical conclave cannot be challenged, even if they profess a «defective faith» in a modernist and masonic goodness. Hence, according to them, such «conclaves» would be absolutely binding, notwithstanding the full legislation of the Church.

To clarify the pertinent ecclesiastical law, following the Magisterial teaching on the subject, one must say that the pope-elect should profess the right faith and this must be morally certain and not incur any impediments laid down by the bull “Cum ex apostolates officio”; impediments in whose presence the cleric can only be elected by mistake, by a conclave which has deviated from the faith, even if this can only be ascertained afterwards. It will be said that it was impossible to know such an intention of the fake “papabile” which therefore did not hinder the electors to elect, in this case, Roncalli.
As a matter of fact this could have been recognized by the watchful prelates. But even for Card. Ottaviani, who knew the dossier of Roncalli, suspect of modernism and hence banned from teaching, and still voted for him, Roncalli’s defectiveness has been subsequently made manifest by his acts. In these acts was not possible to explain away any of his perverted ambiguities.
To focus on Roncalli, who, among the other deviant modernist «conciliar popes» was the least conspicuous, is to focus on the beginnings of a process attempting the protestantization and opening of the Church to the world, as it is elaborately proven in another article on the «ecumenical conciliar church»
The most recommended readings about Roncalli are the vast studies of Fr. Francesco Ricossa. To give a flavor of his broad and elaborate workmanship, here we translate from Italian the final part of his analysis published in the number 42 of “Sodalitium”, 19th episode: GIOVANNI XXIII E LA MASSONERIA.
«Masonry and ecumenism
I will demonstrate the relationship between these two following the book of Marsudon: “Ecumenism as Seen by a Mason of Tradition”, the thesis of an intimate friend of John XXIII, who (according to the masonic rituals) is, perfectly ecumenical: «Ad dissipata colligenda: to reunite what has been dispersed» (pg. 59). It can be seen that ecumenism is the legitimate brainchild of Masonry, by which it unites all religions, as a man-centered super-tradition … «We think, for example- writes Marsaudon- of the famous bull of excommunication by Clement XII, fulminating against our predecessors (…). Today we know what the true reasons of its promulgation were. Clement XII has simply denied our predecessors the possibility to receive adepts of several different religions. In our times, our brother Franklin Roosevelt has extended the possibility to adore God following their own principles and according to their own convictions. Behold toleration and even ecumenism! We, Masons of the Tradition, allow ourselves to paraphrase and transpose these words of a distinguished statesman adapting them to the circumstances; the names Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, Israelite, Moslem, Hindu, Buddhist, free thinkers and free believers are, for us, but names; the surname is Mason (pg. 126). «We even say that Pius IX, Leo XIII are, as we hesitate to call them condemned, particularly forgotten. In the beginning of this essay we quoted R. P. Lépiecier, a defunct cardinal, fierce persecutor of heretics. Today one does not speak of a reconciliation, but of freedom of conscience, so dear to John XXIII. We think that not even a Mason worthy of the name, who has endeavored more than the others to practice tolerance could boast of any of the irreversible results of the Council, regardless of the momentary conclusions. It was obvious that even the most dogmatic Church should one day adapt or disappear, and in order to adapt, must return to the Sources. Joined by the truly sincere Christians, we can but hope: hope that John XXIII did not live, worked, prayed, suffered and died in vain (pg. 119-120).
Perhaps the fact that the first vociferous gesture of John XIII on ecumenical matters was praised by a mason, was not a mere coincidence. This was the reception of the Anglican primate, Geoffrey F. Fisher «Archbishop of Canterbury, received in the Vatican on December 2nd, 1960. Of Fisher, former Grand Master Gamberini writes: “Initiated in the Old Reptonian Lodge, number 3725 of the Grand Lodge of England in 1916”, “in 1939, in this Grand Lodge of the world had the role of Great Chaplain, designated as ‘Great Orator’ in the Latino-Catholic lodges (78). P. Esposito asks: did he have a role in starting of the Rome-London dialogue, whose idea originates from Fisher himself, given that he had been active, and might still be active, in the Lodge?
NOTES: 78) GIORDANO GAMBERINI, Mille volti di massoni, Roma, Erasmo, 1975, pag. 229, cit. da R. ESPOSITO, Santi e massoni…, op. cit., pag. 214. 79) R. ESPOSITO, Santi e massoni …, op. cit., pg. 213. 80) Esposito cites some studies supporting that in 1955 there were 17 Anglican “bishops” and 500 “prelates” of the highest masonic ranks! (op. cit., pg. 214).
The next issue at hand is that of a cleric, a putative pope despite his notorious masonic activity. What evidence could be more relevant and pertinent to detect the masonic intentions of a «papabile»- after he has been elected- if not his actions, including the ecumenical «robber council», so cherished by Masonry, that he has foisted on the Church? Fortunately the Church has already promulgated an infallible statement about this subject of a conclave electing someone who has defected from the faith, as discovered a posteriori. Namely, the Bull «Cum ex apostolates» of Pope Paul IV who, defining the issue, declares the election null and void.
6. The invalidity of all promotions of those who have defected from the Faith
In addition, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity We enact, determine, decree and define:] that if ever at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy:
(i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless;
(ii) it shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through possession of administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or Veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any period of time in the foregoing situation.
7. The faithful may not obey but must avoid those who have defected from the Faith
Those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration, of all dignity, position, honor, title, authority, office and power; … the faithful shall be permitted at any time to withdraw with impunity from obedience and devotion to those thus promoted or elevated and to avoid them as warlocks, heathens, publicans, and heresiarchs (the same subject persons, nevertheless, remaining bound by the duty of fidelity and obedience to any future Bishops, Archbishops, Patriarchs, Primates, Cardinals and Roman Pontiff canonically entering).»
In conclusion: Given that the authority of a Pope comes directly from God, one can understand the worry of a Catholic Pope that anyone should follow a deviant, who putatively received from a human conclave of cardinals such a power; this document comes as godsent. Therefore, it is maliciously presumed to be as a root of the Church´s ills. No. All claimants from Roncalli to Bergoglio must be considered heresiarchs coming from an invalid conclave. They can deceive man, but not God.
The election of a true and valid Pope, positively willed by God, will only be possible when the small renmant finally unites and witnesses to these facts. This would be a fervent wish for the Fatima centenary.
[1]Sir Oliver Locker-Sampson, alto esponente conservatore nel Parlamento di Lon­dra. Intervistato sui motivi della costante politica inglese a favore del Sionismo e dello Stato d’Israele, egli rispose: «Winston (Churchill), Lloyd George, Balfour e io siamo stati allevati come protestanti inte­grali, credenti nell’avvento di un nuovo Salvatore quando la Palestina ritornerà agli ebrei».

These are some implicit phrases in the prophecy of Fatima given by Our Lady when she says and repeats: “If you do what I ask of you …. Or else …”

We know that this Prophecy was a response to the universal supplication of the Church in the desperate times of war, and was subsequently confirmed by the miracle of the Sun, «so that all may believe». The prophecy has already contained everything important showing that it offers an extremely important and miraculous aid to the Church and to the world.

Perhaps there might have been some difficulties on the natural level to figure out everything our Heavenly Mother wanted to transmit through the children. But this was possible and a prudent thing to do. Since the necessary graces were lacking, and Providence even permitted compliance to be impeded.

Years have passed until these words could have yielded any results. Even today it is veiled by silence and confusion. It was the beginning of a tragic century for the Church and the world.

It is then always timely to return to the historic lesson furnished by the Prophecy, which very few care to understand, let alone relate to the words of Jesus, like any prophecy did not come from the Lord of time and history.

On this centenary of Fatima and at this dark moment of history can one persist to refuse to understand this, and hence to continue to have some catastrophic consequences on the horizon? Let us, therefore recapitulate the events starting from 1917, which still indelibly mark our days.

-The arrival of the Americans to Europe to defeat the German and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Europe was being Americanized, even in the realm of religion, where the Americanist ecumenism unfortunately dominates.

-The Bolshevik revolution in Russia, which spread its errors throughout the world; these are some falsehoods against Christianity that even after the fall of the Soviet Empire are being spread by other malign entities.

-The green signal of the English Crown to Zionism, i.e. the Balfour declaration which did not disguise the intention to precipitate the end time prophecies related to the ending of the time of the nations.

-The shameful peace treaty that has inevitably caused the Second World War. Therefore, in order to deal with the beasts of the French Republic, the hyenas of the City and the jackals of Wall Street, the Germans have unleashed Hitler, greedy enough to devour the world.

-The foreseen and prophesied war which was worse, resulted in more victims and ended with the perfidious treaty of Yalta to divide the world, which in turn unexpectedly gave more power to the brutal Stalin.

-The deterioration of the Papacy, which did not follow the great feat of Pope St. Pius X, nor did it paid due attention to the Fatima Prophecy, and gave some contradictory solutions to the human issues at hand, that ended in the debacle that followed Pope Pius XII.

It was then fulfilled what St. Gregory the Great has predicted:

The Church in the last days will be deprived of her powers. The prophetic spirit will hide from her, she will lose the necessary graces to discharge her public office, the grace of abstinence will be diminished, her teaching powers will vanish, even if not completely, and so will the power of miracles and prodigies. An army of apostate priests will be prepared to the Antichrist. In the end times there will be a perfect unity of the evil, while between the just there will be division and discord.” (Book XXXV on Job c.1. Epistles 1 v, 1, XVIII). But let us see:

Pope Benedict XV, who invoked the aid of the Mediatrix and then did not acknowledge It, has finished his reign without saying a single word about Fatima and Communism, the two events that highlighted his pontificate.

Pius XI took up the challenge of so many Concordats, trying even to come to terms with the Soviet Union, but the Fatima demands were all but forgotten while his encyclical condemning communism as intrinsically perverted, waited fifteen long years in the making.

Pius XII, the Pope of Fatima, has tried to comply with the request, but only halfway, and allowed the words of the Blessed Mother to be perverted for political purposes. It was he who has promoted the future wreckers of the Church.

Because punishment must be meted out wherever the delict has been committed, and since these three popes were the ones leaving the door open to a “modernist papacy”, assenting to the construction of a new order to substitute the Christian Order, masonic and Zionist, altering the words of Our Lord and rendering them powerless as are many other ideologies, the Papacy has collapsed after Pius XII.

Hence, politicians and the clergy, who have reduced Christianity to a naught, did not give any indications of awareness that today´s disaster will end in a total collapse, a dead end. In fact, Order and Common Good has always depended on the Christian spirit, the very same they so nefariously have attacked or abandoned.

The Key Question: the Perfidy of a False Papacy

It is obvious that the root of all problems is the lack of a Catholic Papacy on which all Christianity hinges. The awareness of the central importance of this truth, commonly unknown, if not denied by a clerical world living happily in its fatal heedlessness, is also lacking. They devise crooked theories about the impossibility of any human solution, cunningly coining the lofty term of “conclavism” as if the main problem were not the false popes elected by conclaves that must be declared null and void, but those attesting to this nefarious vacancy and demand a true Pope.

As long as the return of a true pope is desired, without inventing a church not needing a Vicar of Christ for clarifying the issues of Faith and morals, the legitimate aspiration for all Catholics, and even a chief duty for the clergy is to do everything in their power to convene a «conclave» to elect a legitimate pope. Hence, the Catholic who prays for this, wills it. Of course, one should be aware of a «wild conclavism», a ridiculous act of a group purporting to create a universal religious authority out of thin air. However, one must recall that the most pernicious «conclavism» repudiates a fundamental assumption of a true conclave, namely that it can only elect a tried and true Catholic to receive his powers directly from God and not from the conclave to which should not be imputed an absolute authority as some did in the case of John 23.

Therefore, the impasse at hand remains to be the following: when and where will be possible to elect a pope by an atomized Church? This is not really as difficulty as it seems, once the invalidity of the conclaves electing modernists and masons becomes widely recognized. Until then everything remains thwarted due to an erroneous vision of the true apostolic succession.  

The consequence is that today the religious life, without the legitimacy of the Sacraments, the ordinary jurisdiction of bishops and priests, who should be under Christ through His Vicar, is muddled up in the absence thereof. Theories that call this ridiculous «wild conclavism» an absolute evil add more to the confusion. This leaves many frozenly inert and even worse, leads them into an «absolute conclavism» which through absurd propositions purports to impose the legitimacy of some «materialiter» antichrists; whose authority, for being elected by an apparently canonical conclave cannot be challenged, even if they profess a «defective faith» in a modernist and masonic goodness. Hence, according to them, such «conclaves» would be absolutely binding, notwithstanding the full legislation of the Church.

To clarify the pertinent ecclesiastical law, following the Magisterial teaching on the subject, one must say that the pope-elect should profess the right faith and this must be morally certain and not incur any impediments laid down by the bull “Cum ex apostolates officio”; impediments in whose presence the cleric can only be elected by mistake, by a conclave which has deviated from the faith, even if this can only be ascertained afterwards. It will be said that it was impossible to know such an intention of the fake “papabile” which therefore did not hinder the electors to elect, in this case, Roncalli.

As a matter of fact this could have been recognized by the watchful prelates. (Attention here, I was not 100% sure what to do.) But even for Card. Ottaviani, who knew the dossier of Roncalli, suspect of modernism and hence banned from teaching, and still voted for him, Roncalli’s defectiveness has been subsequently made manifest by his acts. In these acts was not possible to explain away any of his perverted ambiguities.

To focus on Roncalli, who, among the other deviant modernist «conciliar popes» was the least conspicuous, is to focus on the beginnings of a process attempting the protestantization and opening of the Church to the world, as it is elaborately proven in another article on the «ecumenical conciliar church» (see if I understood this correctly).

The most recommended readings about Roncalli are the vast studies of Fr. Francesco Ricossa. To give a flavor of his broad and elaborate workmanship, here we translate from Italian the final part of his analysis published in the number 42 of “Sodalitium”, 19th episode: GIOVANNI XXIII E LA MASSONERIA.

«Masonry and ecumenism

I will demonstrate the relationship between these two following the book of Marsudon: “Ecumenism as Seen by a Mason of Tradition”, the thesis of an intimate friend of John XXIII, who (according to the masonic rituals) is, perfectly ecumenical: «Ad dissipata colligenda: to reunite what has been dispersed» (pg. 59). It can be seen that ecumenism is the legitimate brainchild of Masonry, by which it unites all religions, as a man-centered super-tradition … «We think, for example- writes Marsaudon- of the famous bull of excommunication by Clement XII, fulminating against our predecessors (…). Today we know what the true reasons of its promulgation were. Clement XII has simply denied our predecessors the possibility to receive adepts of several different religions. In our times, our brother Franklin Roosevelt has extended the possibility to adore God following their own principles and according to their own convictions. Behold toleration and even ecumenism! We, Masons of the Tradition, allow ourselves to paraphrase and transpose these words of a distinguished statesman adapting them to the circumstances; (attention here, I wasn´t sure of the original) the names Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, Israelite, Moslem, Hindu, Buddhist, free thinkers and free believers are, for us, but names; the surname is Mason (pg. 126). «We even say that Pius IX, Leo XIII are, as we hesitate to call them condemned, particularly forgotten. In the beginning of this essay we quoted R. P. Lépiecier, a defunct cardinal, fierce persecutor of heretics. Today one does not speak of a reconciliation, but of freedom of conscience, so dear to John XXIII. We think that not even a Mason worthy of the name, who has endeavored more than the others to practice tolerance could boast of any of the irreversible results of the Council, regardless of the momentary conclusions. It was obvious that even the most dogmatic Church should one day adapt or disappear, and in order to adapt, must return to the Sources. Joined by the truly sincere Christians, we can but hope: hope that John XXIII did not live, worked, prayed, suffered and died in vain (pg. 119-120).  

Perhaps the fact that the first vociferous gesture of John XIII on ecumenical matters was praised by a mason, was not a mere coincidence. This was the reception of the Anglican primate, Geoffrey F. Fisher «Archbishop of Canterbury, received in the Vatican on December 2nd, 1960. Of Fisher, former Grand Master Gamberini writes: “Initiated in the Old Reptonian Lodge, number 3725 of the Grand Lodge of England in 1916”, “in 1939, in this Grand Lodge of the world had the role of Great Chaplain,  designated as ‘Great Orator’ in the Latino-Catholic lodges (78). P. Esposito asks:  did he have a role in starting of the Rome-London dialogue, whose idea originates from Fisher himself, given that he had been active, and might still be active, in the Lodge?

NOTES: 78) GIORDANO GAMBERINI, Mille volti di massoni, Roma, Erasmo, 1975, pag. 229, cit. da R. ESPOSITO, Santi e massoni…, op. cit., pag. 214. 79) R. ESPOSITO, Santi e massoni …, op. cit., pg. 213. 80) Esposito cites some studies supporting that in 1955 there were 17 Anglican “bishops” and 500 “prelates” of the highest masonic ranks! (op. cit., pg. 214).

The next issue at hand is that of a cleric, a putative pope despite his notorious masonic activity. What evidence could be more relevant and pertinent to detect the masonic intentions of a «papabile»- after he has been elected- if not his actions, including the ecumenical «robber council», so cherished by Masonry, that he has foisted on the Church? Fortunately the Church has already promulgated an infallible statement about this subject of a conclave electing someone who has defected from the faith, as discovered a posteriori.   Namely, the Bull «Cum ex apostolates» of Pope Paul IV who, defining the issue, declares the election null and void.

  1. The invalidity of all promotions of those who have defected from the Faith

In addition, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity We enact, determine, decree and define:] that if ever at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy:

(i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless;

(ii) it shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through possession of administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or Veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any period of time in the foregoing situation.

  1. The faithful may not obey but must avoid those who have defected from the Faith

Those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration, of all dignity, position, honor, title, authority, office and power; … the faithful shall be permitted at any time to withdraw with impunity from obedience and devotion to those thus promoted or elevated and to avoid them as warlocks, heathens, publicans, and heresiarchs (the same subject persons, nevertheless, remaining bound by the duty of fidelity and obedience to any future Bishops, Archbishops, Patriarchs, Primates, Cardinals and Roman Pontiff canonically entering).»

In conclusion: Given that the authority of a Pope comes directly from God, one can understand the worry of a Catholic Pope that anyone should follow a deviant, who putatively received from a human conclave of cardinals such a power; this document comes as godsent. Therefore, it is maliciously presumed to be as a root of the Church´s ills. No. All claimants from Roncalli to Bergoglio must be considered heresiarchs coming from an invalid conclave. They can deceive man, but not God.

The election of a true and valid Pope, positively willed by God, will only be possible when the small renmant finally unites and witnesses to these facts. This would be a fervent wish for the Fatima centenary.

[1]Sir Oliver Locker-Sampson, alto esponente conservatore nel Parlamento di Lon­dra. Intervistato sui motivi della costante politica inglese a favore del Sionismo e dello Stato d’Israele, egli rispose: «Winston (Churchill), Lloyd George, Balfour e io siamo stati allevati come protestanti inte­grali, credenti nell’avvento di un nuovo Salvatore quando la Palestina ritornerà agli ebrei».

Anúncios

2 Respostas para “IN THE PROPHECY OF FATIMA … THE MYSTERIES OF A DREADFUL CENTENARY

  1. Rev Bellwood fevereiro 7, 2017 às 5:45 pm

    Dear Arai, Thanks for this article in English, (even if a rather quaint English!) as I haven’t the mental energy nowadays to struggle through yr Portuguese, or even Italian. I haven’t altered my position, however, am still una cum, even tho’ I have certain doubts on the question. I often pray for you and yr family. Am still working at the girls’ school here at Kernabat, Brittany, run by the Fanjeaux nuns, and also work with the FSSPX priory at Dinan. Am hoping to come to Fatima for the big pilgrimage in August but not sure yet. Am trying to prove Fatima here with a small “Pilgrim Virgin”, also the Pentecost pilgrimage to Paris will be on Fatima. Am still in good standing with the Rosminians, who are beginning slowly to realise that Vat 11 wasn’t such a good thing after all. Hoping to see you this summer, God willing, and may Our Lady bless you abundantly in the coming months, In Corde Mariae, Don Roberto >

    • Pro Roma Mariana fevereiro 7, 2017 às 6:48 pm

      Dear don Roberto, when you say that you (finally) have certain doubts on the question of «una cum, you have altered your position. I am glad you have commented in this site, giving some news on you and the possibility to come here for the Centenary. I will be glad to test your mental struggling through my Portuguese, or even Italian. And be sure I should be long on talking about certainties regarding the Holy Sacrifice of Our Lord, Who is not well witnessed in the middle of doubts and quid pro quos. In Cordibus Jesu et Mariae. Arai

Deixe um comentário

Preencha os seus dados abaixo ou clique em um ícone para log in:

Logotipo do WordPress.com

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta WordPress.com. Sair / Alterar )

Imagem do Twitter

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Twitter. Sair / Alterar )

Foto do Facebook

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Facebook. Sair / Alterar )

Foto do Google+

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Google+. Sair / Alterar )

Conectando a %s

Blondet & Friends

Il meglio di Maurizio Blondet unito alle sue raccomandazioni di lettura

AMOR DE LA VERDAD

que preserva de las seducciones del error” (II Tesal. II-10).

Pro Roma Mariana

Fátima e a Paixão da Igreja

Radio Spada

Radio Spada - Tagliente ma puntuale

Catholic Pictures

Handmaid of Hallowedground

Hallowedground

Traditional Catholic Visualism

Acies Ordinata

"Por fim, meu Imaculado Coração triunfará"

RADIO CRISTIANDAD

La Voz de la Tradición Católica

%d blogueiros gostam disto: